West Midlands Interchange (Four Ashes rail freight interchange) public inquiry.
1st March 2019
Freight on Rail fully supports the Four Ashes proposal which is predicated on the economic, social and environmental benefits of removing HGVs from our Strategic Road Network in line with Government policy
Increasing rail freight volumes is part of the Government’s strategy to reduce CO2 and air pollutionemissions, road congestion and road collisions. In order to increase rail freight, interchanges such as Four Ashes, are needed at strategic locations with good road and rail connections, across the UK.
Rail freight helps reduce road congestion which adversely affected productivity. For example, an average freight train using Four Ashes could remove 77 HGVs from the Strategic road network.
Inrix estimated that road congestion costs the UK £30 billion in 2016 with the UK ranked the fourth most congested developed country in the world and third most congested in Europe. Building more roads alone will not solve the problems as it creates new traffic, because when a new road is built, new traffic will divert onto it, a well-known and long-established effect ‘induced traffic’. The FTA stated that it costs around £1 a minute to run a 44 tonne truck so any hold-ups have a considerable financial impact on operations; transferring more freight to rail, helps make road operations more reliable.
Job creation and re-generation benefits of terminals
Four Ashes will generate around 8,500 jobs with £10m business rates to the local authority. Furthermore, this investment will give the wider rail freight industry confidence to follow suit.
Scarcity of suitable sites which justifies use of green belt in very special circumstances for Four Ashes
The justification for using greenbelt land, in very special circumstances, is based on the scarcity of suitable sites for SRFIs which need to be near conurbations and have large flat sitesin line with Government spatial policy:-
The Planning Act 2008 (‘the Act’) sets out the planning process for Developments which are classified as Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects including SRFIs.
In the case of SRFIs, the ‘National Networks National Policy Statement’ (the NPS) , published in December 2014, sets out the need for (and Government’s policies to deliver) Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects on the national road and rail networks in England, including SRFIs. The NPS policy states that there is a compelling need for SRFIs, and due to the fact that there are very limited sites suitable for SRFIs, the use of the green belt can be justified in special circumstances.
Four Ashes is located adjacent to the Strategic Road Network which minimises the impact of the extra HGV movements on the local road network; it is intersected by the strategic Rail Freight Network. The terminal and warehousing have been designed in a way to limit the adverse impacts such as noise, dust, air & light pollution on neighbours. Moreover, the following additional mitigation measures have been made as a result of the stage 2 statutory and stage 2a focused consultation.
Freight on Rail believes the Four Ashes proposal meets all the criteria set out in the planning system; we have also written detailed notes expanding on the points made in our letter.
Detailed notes on the economic, safety and environmental benefits of rail freight with regard to the application for the West Midlands interchange (Four Ashes)
Rail freight is worth £1,7 billion per year to the UK economy; importantly, these benefits are realized across the country with the North West of England, Yorkshire and the Humber and the Midlands as the highest beneficiaries at a time when the Government is trying to re-balance the economy away from the South-East and London.
Why strategic rail freight interchanges needed to increase rail freight volumes
Detailed analysis from W. H. Malcolm Ltd, which run the SRFI at Daventry in Northamptonshire and Campaign for Better Transport, shows that the SRFI removes far more lorry miles than previously thought. In 2017,rail services from DIRFT in fact remove 64 million lorry miles mainly off the congested strategic road network.
Figures on HGV involvement rates in critical incidents on the SRN make the economic and safety case for rail freight
Rail freight also reduces road infrastructure costs
Environmental benefits of rail freight
By contrast, the total greenhouse gas emissions from rail (including both freight and passengers combined) are an order of magnitude lower at less than 2% of total UK transport emissions.
HGVs contribute 17 per cent of surface access CO2 emissions, despite making up only 5 per cent of road vehicles whereas both passenger and freight rail together are less than 2 per cent. Source DfT Rail Freight Strategy September 2016
Energy efficiency is directly related to carbon dioxide emissions, rail is significantly more energy efficient than other modes with the exception of shipping. A tonne of goods can travel 246 miles by rail as opposed to 88 miles by road on a gallon of fuel
Air quality benefits of rail freight
Safety benefits of rail freight
HGVs were almost five times more likely than cars to be involved in fatal accidents on minor roads in 2017.
This graph shows HGV involvement rate in fatal crashes on different road types over the past 11 years.